ICDAR 2026 Competition on Information Extraction from Atomic Layer Deposition/Etching (ALD/E) Scientific Figures

Fahad Ahmed, Sören Auer, and Jennifer D'Souza

TIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology · L3S Research Center

Taxonomy of scientific figure types used by ALD/E-ImageMiner, cropped to remove the title

Scientific figure comprehension and reasoning using multimodal AI requires integrating visual perception with domain-specific reasoning to extract meaningful knowledge, often not presented in the text of a research publication. The Sci-ImageMiner benchmark dataset, accompanied by a community-driven competition, raises the bar over prior scientific competitions by curating a comprehensive, expert-annotated dataset across four end-to-end complementary tasks. The competition attracted 68 active participants and 1,263 public/private submissions from 9 January 2026 to 8 April 2026. Our results show that state-of-the-art multimodal models perform well on classification and summarization tasks but struggle with data extraction and scientific reasoning, particularly in visual question-answering. These findings reveal key limitations and highlight challenges and opportunities for improving domain-aware multimodal AI systems. Overall, the Sci-ImageMiner benchmark and competition establish a rigorous platform for advancing research in scientific figure comprehension and reasoning and demonstrate the potential of state-of-the-art approaches for a challenging and complex research area.

205source papers
1,951full-figure records
49taxonomy classes
1,263competition submissions

Benchmark

The released benchmark covers ALD and ALE papers across experimental and simulation use cases. It provides train, dev, and gold-standard test splits with figure images, captions, bounding boxes, and task-specific annotations. Task definitions are summarized from the official competition task description.

We collected 205 research publications in ALD/E materials science, encompassing both experimental and simulation-based studies. MinerU is used to extract textual content in structured JSON format along with high-resolution figures in JPEG format, preserving semantic structure and visual fidelity for downstream multimodal analysis as illustrated in Figure 1.

Overview of the ALD/E-ImageMiner benchmark curation workflow
Fig. 1: Overview of the ALD/E-ImageMiner benchmark end-to-end curation workflow.

The dataset is organized into two primary categories: ALD and ALE, which are further divided into experimental and simulation-based studies. It is partitioned into standard train/dev/test splits with the statistics shown in Table 1 and the organization illustrated in Figure 2.

ALD/E-ImageMiner dataset organization hierarchy
Fig. 2: Illustration describing the ALD/E-ImageMiner dataset organization hierarchy. Research papers are numerically indexed, containing the PDF, content.json (sections and figure captions), along with figures and annotation JSON files inside the images directory.

Benchmark Task Descriptions

The four panels below summarize the official competition task definitions with compact examples from the task website while preserving the input/output structure.

Task 1: Classification

A supervised multi-class image classification task. Systems must identify one of the 49 figure classes from a scientific figure.

Classification task example showing a band diagram
Example: Band Diagram
Predicted class: Band Diagram
Inputs
A scientific figure extracted from an ALD/E research paper.
Context
Optional metadata, such as figure caption text, may be provided.
Output
Predicted class label corresponding to one of the 49 figure types.

Primary metric: F1.

Submit / results

Task 2: Data Table Extraction

Structured reconstruction of tabular data encoded in scientific charts. Systems identify field labels, table structure, and textual or numerical cell values.

Data table extraction task example showing a mass change chart
Example: chart values reconstructed as Markdown table cells
Example output: | Time (s) | Mass Change (ng/cm²) | | 0 | 0 | 2000 | -500 | 4000 | -1000 | 6000 | -1500 |
Input
Scientific chart or plot image, such as a bar chart, line chart, scatter plot, spectra chart, or phase diagram.
Output
Machine-readable Markdown table representation of the quantitative chart.
Fields
Field/column names of visualized entities and extracted textual or numerical cell values.

Metrics: RMS + TEDS.

Submit / results

Task 3: Summarization

Generate concise, factual summaries that capture key trends, relationships, and scientific insights presented in the figure. Systems must ground their interpretation in the visual content.

Summarization task example showing a polar heatmap
Example: polar heatmap summarized in 1-3 sentences
Example summary: Polar heatmap of Al2O3 etch rate distribution across a wafer, with rates peaking centrally and decreasing radially toward the edge.
Input
Scientific chart or plot image.
Context
Optional metadata, such as figure caption text, may be provided.
Output
Short textual summary of 1-3 sentences describing main trends and takeaways.
Submit / results

Task 4: Visual Question Answering

Fine-grained reasoning over figures through natural-language questions that reference axes, legends, data patterns, and scientific meaning.

Visual question answering task example showing an etch-rate chart
Example: question answering over plotted etch-rate trends
Question type: Comparative/Trend
Question: For the etching of aluminum based material, does it matter which type of material it is?
Answer type: Paragraph
Answer: No, it does not seem to matter. Both Al2O3 and AlNx have similar etch results.
Subtasks
Process-oriented, comparative/trend, structure-property, and application/performance reasoning.
Inputs
Scientific chart or plot image, natural-language question, and optional relevant paragraph or figure-caption context.
Outputs
Yes/No, Factoid, List, or Paragraph answer.
Submit / results

Results

The strongest systems were not single-model baselines. They combined vision-language models with task structure: hierarchy-aware classification, chart-to-table training data, context retrieval, alignment training, and answer-type-aware VQA pipelines.

Loading Codabench leaderboard snapshot...

Submit to the Live Leaderboard on Codabench

The competition continues beyond the official competition period. The benchmark is now in its post-competition phase, and the leaderboard will remain open indefinitely for new submissions. Evaluate your multimodal system on the public leaderboard using the resources below.

Use the GitHub repository to access the competition dataset, Codabench submission-format guidelines, and the evaluation scripts used on the Codabench competition pages.

Use the Hugging Face dataset to visually explore the data. It supports image class style loading by train/dev/test split.

Join the Official Google Group

Join the official Sci-ImageMiner Google Group for competition announcements and a place to ask questions and interact with the participant community.

Citation

@article{ahmed2026icdar,
  title   = {ICDAR 2026 Competition on Information Extraction from
             Atomic Layer Deposition/Etching (ALD/E) Scientific Figures},
  author  = {Ahmed, Fahad and Auer, S{\"o}ren and D'Souza, Jennifer},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.26848},
  year    = {2026},
  url     = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26848}
}